Shine on Flexible Endoscope Reprocessing - ASP Learning Lab
Shine on Flexible Endoscope Reprocessing

Shine on Flexible Endoscope Reprocessing

Carlos Palos, MD, Mr. David Bellamy, Cori Ofstead, MSPH, Mr. Rob Warburton, Monique Barakat, MD PhD, Eng. John Prendergast

Create a free account to access all information

Endoscopic procedures are central to modern diagnostic and therapeutic care, with approximately 200 million procedures performed worldwide and integral to cancer screening programs¹⁻⁴. Despite these advantages, flexible endoscopes are among the most complex reusable medical devices to reprocess safely, and endoscope-transmitted infections, though underreported, remain a recognized complication with serious clinical and financial consequences⁵,⁶. ERCP carries particular risk, with post-procedure cholangitis occurring in 2–4% of cases and documented outbreaks of multidrug-resistant organisms, especially carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales⁷⁻¹⁰. Biofilm formation within endoscope channels further complicates reprocessing, reducing disinfectant efficacy and contributing to persistent contamination¹¹⁻¹⁵. Effective reprocessing therefore requires standardized, validated procedures at every stage — cleaning, high-level disinfection or sterilization, drying, storage, and traceable documentation¹⁶⁻¹⁸. As flexible endoscopy has evolved from simple diagnostic tools into complex therapeutic instruments, structural complexity has increased, making reprocessing more challenging¹⁹,²⁰. Addressing these challenges requires enhanced professional expertise, optimized reprocessing units, reconsideration of current classification frameworks, and, where feasible, evaluation of sterilization strategies²¹⁻²⁵. Thorough manual cleaning is foundational to infection prevention, removing organic debris, reducing bioburden, and preventing early biofilm formation²⁶⁻²⁹, with international standards emphasizing pre-cleaning at the point of use within 15 minutes of the procedure¹⁶,³⁰⁻³².

 

Inside the eBook, you’ll learn about:

  • The scale and clinical significance of endoscope-transmitted infections (ETIs)
  • Why flexible endoscopes, especially duodenoscopes used in ERCP, pose elevated reprocessing risk
  • How biofilm formation undermines standard disinfection protocols
  • The essential steps of validated reprocessing: cleaning, disinfection/sterilization, drying, storage, and documentation
  • How endoscope complexity has evolved and what that means for reprocessing standards
  • Strategic priorities for reducing infection risk, including workforce training and classification reform

 

Reasons to download the eBook:

  • Understand the real-world risks tied to endoscope reprocessing failures
  • Get an evidence-based breakdown of where current protocols fall short
  • Learn practical, guideline-aligned steps to strengthen your reprocessing workflow
  • Access curated references from leading clinical and regulatory sources
  • Support infection prevention and patient safety initiatives at your institution

Authors

  • David Bellamy

    David Bellamy

    Mr.

    Vice President- World Federation of Hospital Sterilization Sciences, Sterilizing Services Department Manager- NSW Health

  • Cori Ofstead

    Cori Ofstead

    MSPH

    CEO at Ofstead & Associates, Inc.

  • Rob Warburton

    Rob Warburton

    MBA CMgrFCMI MIDSc Chtd

    Trust Decontamination Lead Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Institute of Decontamination Sciences, Director of Communication & Chairman IDSc Midlands Branch.

  • Monique Barakat

    Monique Barakat

    MD PhD

    Associate Professor of Pediatrics & Medicine Divisions of Pediatric and Adult Gastroenterology and Hepatology

  • John Prendergast

    John Prendergast

    Eng.

    uthorized Engineer (Decontamination) Principal Decontamination Engineer – NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership Specialist Estates Services

  • Carlos Palos

    Carlos Palos

    MD.

    Internal Medicine & Intensive Care Specialist Infection Control & Antimicrobial Stewardship

References

  1. Jensen DM, Machicado GA. The advantages and disadvantages of endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57(6):S3-S6.
  2. Bisschops R, East JE, Hassan C, et al. Endoscopy around the world: perspectives. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48(6):S1-S10.
  3. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Role of gastrointestinal endoscopy in the screening of digestive tract cancers. Endoscopy. 2020;52(3):217-225.
  4. Grand View Research. Endoscopy procedures estimates market size report, 2030. 2024.
  5. Barakat MT, Banerjee S. Novel algorithms for reprocessing, drying and storing endoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2020;30(4):677-691.
  6. Kovaleva J, Peters FT, van der Mei HC, et al. Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26(2):231-254.
  7. Hearnshaw SA, Rutter MD, Bevan P, et al. Infection after endoscopic procedures: a large population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2019;157(3):684-693.
  8. Sethi S, Kassem E, El-Serag H. Gastrointestinal endoscopy and risk of infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19(8):1562-1574.e1.
  9. Spach DH, Silverstein FE, Stamm WE. Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(2):117-128.
  10. Ofstead CL, Dirlam Langlay AM, Mueller NJ, Tosh PK, Wetzler HP. Re-evaluating endoscopy-associated infection risk estimates and their implications. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41(8):734-736.
  11. Epstein L, Hunter JC, Arwady MA, et al. New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase–producing carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli associated with exposure to duodenoscopes. JAMA. 2014;312(14):1447-1455.
  12. Larsen S, Russell RV, Ockert LK, et al. Rate and impact of duodenoscope contamination: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;25:100451.
  13. Alfa MJ, Sewell DL, Olson N, et al. The role of biofilms in reprocessing medical devices. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41(5 suppl):S76-S80.
  14. Zong Z, Li M, Li J, et al. A study of the efficacy of bacterial biofilm cleanout methods for endoscope reprocessing. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(6):1898-1903.
  15. Alfa MJ, Singh H. Impact of wet storage and other factors on biofilm formation and contamination of patient-ready endoscopes: a narrative review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(2):236-247.
  16. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. ANSI/AAMI ST91:2021. Flexible and Semi-Rigid Endoscope Processing in Health Care Facilities. Arlington, VA; 2021.
  17. Day LW, Muthusamy VR, Collins J, et al. Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible GI endoscopes and accessories. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;93(1):11-33.e6.
  18. Beilenhoff U, Biering H, Blum R, et al. Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories used in gastrointestinal endoscopy: position statement of ESGE and ESGENA—update 2018. Endoscopy. 2018;50(12):1201-1219.
  19. World Federation for Hospital Sterilization Sciences. WFHSS guidelines: chapter 9—flexible endoscopy reprocessing principles.
  20. Grand View Research. Endoscope sterilization market size, share & trends analysis report, 2025–2030.
  21. Ofstead CL, Hopkins KM, Buro BL, Eiland JE, Wetzler HP. Challenges in achieving effective high-level disinfection in endoscope reprocessing. Am J Infect Control. 2020;48(3):309-315.
  22. Varghese MM, Memic S, Torres-Teran MM, Cadnum JL, Rutala WA, Donskey CJ. Evaluation of a new technology for terminal sterilization of flexible endoscopes using hydrogen peroxide gas plasma. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2025.
  23. Patel A, Jain N. Flexible endoscopes: terminal sterilization and impact to patient safety. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2020;54(suppl 1):80-83.
  24. Omidbakhsh N, Manohar S, Vu R, Nowruzi K. Flexible gastrointestinal endoscope processing challenges, current issues and future perspectives. J Hosp Infect. 2021;110:133-138.
  25. Ofstead CL, Smart AG, Hurst LL, Lamb LA. Endoscope processing effectiveness: A reality check and call to action for infection preventionists and clinicians. Am J Infect Control. 2025;53(7):785-793.
  26. Mishra A, Aggarwal A, Khan F. Medical device-associated infections caused by biofilm-forming microbial pathogens and controlling strategies. Antibiotics (Basel). 2024;13(7):623.
  27. Rather MA, Gupta K, Mandal M. Microbial biofilm: formation, architecture, antibiotic resistance, and control strategies. Braz J Microbiol. 2021;52(4):1701-1718.
  28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008.
  29. Rutala WA, Gergen MF, Sickbert-Bennett EE, Weber DJ. Comparative evaluation of the microbicidal activity of low-temperature sterilization technologies to steam sterilization. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020;41(4):391-395.
  30. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 15883-4:2008.
  31. Gastroenterological Nurses College of Australia. GENCA Guidelines. 2025.
  32. Standards Australia. AS 5369:2023.